The findings of the study are congruent with the literature from the fields of veterinary medicine, social work, nursing, and anthrozoology in that they confirm the significant and primarily positive impact of the social support, trust and bond experienced by human beings from their companion animals. In rank order of participation rate the categories are: Companionship & Presence Emotional & Social Support Purpose & Role How Pets are Different from People Health and Pain Management Pet Intuition & Adaptability Being Positive & in the Moment Pet as Protector & Caregiver Touch Unconditional Love & Devotion Existential & Spiritual Factors Family Members & Finances, and Caretaking of Sick or Dying Pet. From this 487 helping critical incidents and 109 hindering critical incidents were formed into 13 categories that represented the areas of impact. The bulk of the data focused on clear descriptions of the ways in which pets contributed to and/or detracted from the participants¹sense of well being during their illness. From these interviews, 13 personal accounts were created to give voice to the women¹s experiences and the meanings made from their relationships with their pets. The Enhanced Critical Incident Technique method (Butterfield, Borgen, Maglio, & Amundson, 2009) was used to collect information and interpret the interviews of 13 British Columbian women with cancer about their relationships with their companion animals. The goal of this study was to gather information from individuals with cancer who had a pet during their illness and to explore the helpful and unhelpful aspects of that relationship as people dealt with the socio-emotional, physiological and spiritual challenges usually accompanying cancer diagnosis and treatment. This qualitative research examined the little studied area of human-pet relationships and their impact on persons with cancer.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |